My analysis is not an in-depth analysis on every aspect of Google +, this initial analysis on a basic tour and is part of an idea I've always had about the usability of products and services.
This analysis is based on the following idea: when I need a manual to operate a gadget or program or browse for a service, I am totally convinced that it was developed with the user.
In the case of Google +, with all its flaws and despite having used only a few days, I have not the slightest doubt was thought given to the user.
In Google + simplicity of use is a feature that stands out at first. Soon you know where you stand, know what to do without having to ask.
Sure, there are certain things that if or whether we learn from others or read the tricks that offers the service through the help or any comments from Google employees, perhaps 99% of users could not decipher whether alone like someone to write directly to the @ or the + sign. These are tricks that if people Google + does not explain is difficult to realize. But that is another matter, they are minor tricks.
I give you a clear example, compared to Facebook is something that can not be denied, the learning curve network is much less steep Zuckerberg than Google +. Make no mistake here! A steep learning curve means you learn more in less time
In Facebook simplifying things is something that apparently was not priority, and if it was, they were wrong. The way to perform certain defined tasks in Facebook is much more difficult and someone without much experience is easily lost.
Of course we have worked hard in recent times and Facebook has tried to be simplified. They have tried to improve navigation for the user is not lost and arrive quickly at your destination, but still does not approach anything like the ease of use for the Google +.
In Google + everything is much more defined and everything is handled through 4 sections: Stream, Photos, Profile and Circles. Those who can access easily from any part of Google + we find ourselves. Then we have some important tools we can also easily access such as chat, video calls and Sparks.
My point here is that Google + try to incorporate the best of the most popular networks, adapting to what most users need. It is more of the same, includes many features of the other, but enhanced for ease of use by the user.
Read more: http://geeksroom.com/2011/07/por-que-google-no-me-parece-mas-de-lo-mismo/51567/ # ixzz1Rumd9f2k
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
About
Popular Posts
-
France will ban the killing of male chicks by breaking or gassing from next year, a practice denounced by animal welfare groups as barbaric,...
-
Everybody is using it, but (almost) nobody really knows, how it works. Google PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms...
-
In Argentina there are many festivals that pay homage to different foods or typical traditions of each people. In Capilla del Señor, Córdo...
-
In the neighborhood of Villa Luro, Buenos Aires, Argentina, there is a very particular house. This house that has always amazed the nei...
-
Vía: Cancer Monthly Vitamin C whether intravenous or oral is one of the most prevalent types of alternative and complimentary cancer therapi...
-
American were taught to believe that America is the greatest country on earth and that it couldn't possibly get any better. In this vide...
-
Oh my, this could provoke some conspiracy theories about how the show is somehow "rigged". Perhaps one of the best singers to ever...
-
Updated: Odd Aerial "Drone"? Photographed Again Over Capitola, California © 2007 by Linda Moulton Howe ...
-
When events appear to fit together perfectly in our lives it may seem at first that they are random occurrences, things that are the result...
-
Juan Francisco Casas Ruiz (La Carolina, Jaen, 1976) is a Spanish painter and artist. CV Graduate and PhD in Fine Arts from the Universit...
Designed By Blogger Templates
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario